The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research Essay Example

The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research Essay The Importance of stupidity in Scientific Research This essay talk about how two students from graduate school reunited with each other after many years for the first time. They were both Ph. D students at the same time and they were also studying science. One of the friends later dropped out of graduate school. The reason why she dropped out of the school was because she felted stupid in the program. After feeling stupid for a couple of year she decided that it was time for a change. After the meeting, the other friend started to realize that science also made her feel stupid. She goes on to explain that the reason why she like science is that she is good at it. What she is trying to say is that taking high school or college course means doing well in the class and getting good grades in the course. If you are getting good grade in class and know that answer for the test then you are smart. She is a Ph. D. , student and being a Ph. D. they do more of experiment and research project. When she encounters problems with her research, she knows how to ask for helped from the faculty. She learned that instead of being discouraging about herself, to do the best of her ability. We will write a custom essay sample on The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer She also talked about how hard it is to be a Ph. d. student. She stated that science is made harder by competition for grants and space in the top journals. Also she talks about how we do not do a good job of teaching students how to be productively stupid. Students may be given material and review the material and then come back to ace an exam. Other student, whose test maybe preliminary and thesis exam are push more by the faculty. Then when the student get the wrong answer the students start to feel discourage about the subject. And once the student feels this way the faculty has failed but not the student. The point of most exams is not to see if the student will get the answer right but to see if they understand the subject or the concept. The exam can identify the weakness of the student. Productive stupidity means being ignorant by choice. It does not matter how long it take a student to pass a class or an exam, all that matter if he or she passed and that he or she learned something at the end, no matter how long it takes a student to pass a subject or a test. Students may feel stupid at something because they are always getting the wrong answer. This does mean that they are stupid; it only means that they don’t understand it. If the student to continue to practice and work hard toward their goal, they will soon understand and feel like they are smart. The concept of â€Å"The importance of stupidty in scientific research† applies to development through the life span from many different aspects. Human development is trying to understand human constancy and change throughout the lifespan. Human development is associated with social pressure and curiosity to better people’s lives. The lifespan perspective offers a more complex vision of change and the factor that underlie it. So, â€Å"the Importance of stupidly in scientific research â€Å"applies to development through lifespan. Students must understand the material and stay focus in order to understand a subject. They also must have parents and teachers encourage them to make them want to learn more. This will teach them to have confidence in their self which also bring higher self esteem. Student must also know that in life they are going to fail but learn how to adjust problem and fix it, so that next they will achieve. Students must learn never to give up on things you want out of life. An event that happen in my life that has the same concept of the â€Å"The importance of stupidity in scientific research† is when I was in undergraduate school at Paine College. We had to take an Exit exam which is a test all Biology major had to take before they could graduate from college. The first time I took the test, I knew that I was prepared and that I could pass the test. I had so much confidence that when I got the test result back I knew that I passed, so I decided not open it open. Something told me to just open the result up, when I open the result my heart drop because I had failed the test. It took me 8 times to passed the Exit Exam. I wanted to give up some many times on this test. I felt like I was stupid and I felt like a failure. I called myself stupid for not be able to pass a test that I needed to pass to graduate. I had the help of my fellow student, parents, and teacher to not give up but to keep trying. I probably would had gave up if did not have the help of my friend, parents, and teacher

Explore the ways Shakespeare presents ideas of society in The Tempest Essay Example

Explore the ways Shakespeare presents ideas of society in The Tempest Essay Example Explore the ways Shakespeare presents ideas of society in The Tempest Essay Explore the ways Shakespeare presents ideas of society in The Tempest Essay Essay Topic: Ideas The Tempest The Tempest was Shakespeares last play written alone. He used it to express his thoughts on the structure of society, albeit through using certain characters as a mouthpiece. These characters include Gonzalo and Prospero. To begin with, the society on the island consists only of Prospero, Miranda, Caliban and the spirits, which only appear to Prospero. One theme in the play is the idea of usurpation, which is shown several times throughout. One of Calibans reasons for hating Prospero is his idea that Prospero usurped him as ruler of the island. This is made clear as early as Act 1 Scene 2, when Caliban says This islands mine, by Sycorax my mother, which thou takst from me. Antonio also usurped Prospero as Duke of Milan, Stephano wishes to be king of th isle and Sebastian plots to kill Alonso to become King of Naples. On the island, it seems that all social restraints are removed. Antonio and Sebastian would never have dared to plot to murder Alonso back in Italy. The anonymity of the island means that the characters genuine feelings are shown, rather than hidden. This is shown by Antonio and Sebastians conversation. Draw thy sword: one stroke Shall free thee from the tribute which thou payest/And I the king shall love thee.. And also by Gonzalos speech. I think that the play also has messages about colonisation of countries for the British Empire. This is due to the fact that at the time new countries were still being discovered by British explorers like Walter Raleigh. The idea of a ship of nobles landing on an unknown island and disturbing the natives (Caliban) is evocative of the explorers at the time. This does not necessarily mean that Shakspeare is showing his disapproval of colonisation; he could just be including it as a way for the audience to relate the plot to England at the time. Gonzalos speeches in Act 2 Scene 1 are the main indicator of Shakespeares social idealism within the play. He begins by saying Had I plantation of this isle. Here Gonzalo is speculating on the possibilities of the island. However, this also shows that even old, kind Gonzalo wishes for power and control, thus consolidating power as a central theme within the play. Letters should not be known seems at first to suggest that there would be no formal education or even use of written language on the island, but seeing as this could be Shakespeares utopia expressed through Gonzalo, this doesnt appear to make sense. Shakespeare made his living through writing, and so I think that it seems more likely they are referring to names, or the class system, where everyone was judged by their lineage. However, it is significant that at the end of the play, Prospero chooses to give up his magic and return to Italy, and Italian society, where he will in be in charge as is his birthright. This would sat isfy Prosperos need for power. Whilst on the island, Prospero has learned how to become a good leader. This is shown by the way in which he tells Miranda by delayed exposition that those (his magic) being all my study, I cast government upon my brother. This quotation implies that Prospero knows he paved the way for his brother to take over. It also shows that he now knows he was a neglectful leader, which shows some humility, perhaps meaning that his character has changed since being marooned on the island. Gonzalo muses on creating a commonwealth on the island, with no sovreignty, in the presence of the King of Naples. This is quite startling in its outspokeness, and starts to disabuse us of the notion that Gonzalo is just a kindly old fool. This gives us another parallel between Shakespeare and Gonzalo, as Gonzalo voices his commonwealth idea in front of the king, and Shakespeare is sending this message out in front of an audience that could very likely have included royalty. Also, I believe that Prospero presents some ideas of society too. He is a very dominant character, speaking the epilogue, which is unusual for a main character in a Shakespeare play. Prospero manipulates the characters and shapes the story, and is almost always totally in control. This helps to show the manipulative elements in his character. The Tempest tells the story of Prosperos usurpation, and, to put it simply, the plot to get his dukedom back. Prospero presents himself as a victim of his brothers ambition, but it is later shown to us that Prospero was a poor ruler, far more interested in his books than in looking after his country, as is shown but the words those being all my study/ the government I cast upon my brother. Already, due to his dukedom, Prospero is cast in the role of leader. We know that Shakespeare has portrayed him as neglectful of his duties during his reign. This could be a comment on the negative points of having one all powerful leader, as Prosperos charact er does have several negative elements in. He is controlling (quotation), and petty, he threatens Caliban, saying to-night thou shalt have cramps/Side-stitches that shall pen thy breath up Prosperos controlling nature manifests itself in his desire to keep everything happening exactly when and how he wants it. When Miranda and Ferdinand begin to fall in love (as he planned) he says They are both in eithers powers/ But this swift business/ I must uneasy make. He needs it to happen exactly as he planned. Another example of this would be when Ariel asks for his liberty. Instead of asking Ariel for a few hours more, Prospero shows his autocratic nature by reminding Ariel of how he rescued him, and how he can punish him again. The small society on the island that Prospero has created for himself, Miranda and Caliban has him has the head of it. Both Caliban and Miranda obey him, and there is no-one to question his authority. Although he refuses to free Ariel and enslaves Caliban, he never actually intends to harm anyone. This is shown by his question to Ariel But are they, Ariel, safe? It also seems like Ariel actually has the power on the island, as Prospero needs him to work his magic. The way he rules on the island could, therefore be likened to the way we are told he ruled in Milan, where although it was actually him that was the Duke, his brother ruled the country. This idea of society that Prospero has created on the island is that of a single all-powerful ruler. Prospero is eager to return to Naples and the rigid social structure of Italian high society. I believe that this is because the small, relaxed society on the island did not satisfy his need for power over others. He does relinquish his magic, however, which was the main source of his power on the island. I feel that this is because he knows that when he is back in Italy he will not need magic powers to control people, as he will be the rightful duke, and this will be respected by members of Italian society. This also is another example of how important the theme of power is. In conclusion, I think that the island is a microcosm of society, and due to its size, and the small number of people on there, everything is concentrated. For example, Sebastians desire to be King would probably have been suppressed back in Italy, but on the island it is not.

Advances in medicine and related technologies have given society the Research Paper

Advances in medicine and related technologies have given society the power to prolong life. However, the process of dying can also be prolonged. Discuss some of these end-of-life dilemmas - Research Paper Example For a number of patients, hospice care or good palliative can ease suffering, yet a minute but important percentage of dying patients suffer painfully. Nobody makes the choice of prolonging life or prolonging death, not unless the weight of living has so constantly, day in, day out, overshadowed all benefit (Corke, 2010). People who believe that they want to be capable of, for example, taking a lethal amount of drugs or any injection to end their life — they consider that that is the way they are going to feel, but they, in reality, do not know the way they are going to feel when they reach the level where their life’s quality is so reduced that they wish they were already dead that they would sleep and not see the following day (Paulson, 2013). However, to gain that step, to take that ultimate step to decide your own death in a dramatic act is extremely hard, and a majority of people cannot do that (Corke, 2010). This paper will discuss this dilemma (prolonging life or prolonging death) and conclude which is more significant than the other. The moral principles beneficence, autonomy and non-maleficence have changed the medicine practice from a mainly paternalistic loom towards a system of shared/mutual decision making (McDermid & Bagshaw, 2009). Idyllically, this takes place through mutual understanding, a wait-and-see method and thoughtful paternalism. In important matters, doctors should partake in this procedure with full honesty, recognizing their own biases and restrictions with regards to prognosticating (McDermid & Bagshaw, 2009). The Oregon Death with Dignity decree has been in existence for over a decade now, and the main grounds for patients requesting their doctor for this direction have remained the same over that period (McDermid & Bagshaw, 2009). It is not regarding pain because pain can even be